Untitled



Reblogged from writingquotes
If you do not hear music in your words, you have put too much thought into your writing and not enough heart. Terry Brooks (via writingquotes)
Reblogged from maxkirin

subbysarie:

thebrokenheartedthatstillsing:

maxkirin:

"This sentence has five words. Here are five more words. Five-word sentences are fine. But several together become monotonous. Listen to what is happening. The writing is getting boring. The sound of it drones. It’s like a stuck record. The ear demands some variety. Now listen. I vary the sentence length, and I create music. Music. The writing sings. It has a pleasant rhythm, a lilt, a harmony. I use short sentences. And I use sentences of medium length. And sometimes, when I am certain the reader is rested, I will engage him with a sentence of considerable length, a sentence that burns with energy and builds with all the impetus of a crescendo, the roll of the drums, the crash of the cymbals—sounds that say listen to this, it is important.” - Gary Provost

Reading this was so satisfying woah

WRITING!

(via humansrsuperior)

Reblogged from wesleyhill

[According to Gray, “secular believers… are in the grip of unexamined dogmas.”] This will already have occurred to anyone who has spent five minutes browsing, say, the comments sections of Dawkins’ website. Though, as it happens, the most affecting response to this sort of arrogance I’ve encountered is also there, courtesy of an Orthodox believer calling herself Saint Cecilia. (I don’t know her real name, but she certainly has the patience of a saint.) On a comment thread devoted to misunderstanding Hart’s arguments, she gently corrects a few of the usual fallacies. The “pitch” of Christianity, she points out, has “nothing to do with the Big Bang or evolution or anything like that at all.” Nor is the existence of God a scientific proposition: “Christians aren’t talking about a math problem, they’re talking about a Person. And in the vast experience of people who claim to have had a genuine encounter with the Personality called Christ, there are certain things that are involved, such as willingness [and] humility.” The modest atheists respond with their customary persiflage: “Can you spell g-u-l-l-i-b-l-e?” Cecilia isn’t ruffled: “I spell gullible exactly as you did. Well done.” She continues:

If someone is really interested in whether or not God exists, I’d say the best way is to have a little humility and experiment, with an open mind and heart, with the paths that Christians have claimed take you directly to him, in the ways that have worked. If someone isn’t willing to do such a thing, and insists that a discussion about painting be one about mathematics, then the conversation isn’t going to go anywhere.
This spirit of invitation and inquiry is far from gullible, a calumny better directed at the evangelical-atheist faithful who thoughtlessly parrot what Emerson called “the tune of the time.” Again, the point is not whether God does or does not exist, but that, as Cecilia writes elsewhere in the thread, “Everyone is talking past each other and no one seems to be elevating the conversation to where it could and should be.”
Michael Robbins, “Know Nothing” (via wesleyhill)

(via wesleyhill)

Reblogged from makelvenotwar
mountainmanblues:

Hemingway.

mountainmanblues:

Hemingway.

(Source: makelvenotwar, via poetgirl925)


Reblogged from lauranoncrede

Jenna Louise Coleman on the set of Doctor Who [x]

Jenna Louise Coleman on the set of Doctor Who [x]

(Source: lauranoncrede, via arthurpendragonns)

Reblogged from thankyouharrypo
bbcgirl turned 1 today!

bbcgirl turned 1 today!

Reblogged from takemebacktogallifrey
Reblogged from samanthahelene
Perfectly perfect

Perfectly perfect

(Source: samanthahelene, via deborahharkness)